The following is a quote from the court records.
"The Court finds that the Ordinance is unconstitutional because of
vagueness. A
reasonable person could not know what animal would fall within the
definition
of a "wild/exotic animal". The Court further finds that the Ordinance
is
unconstitutional because it violates the Defendants Due Process Rights
in that
it does not provide for a hearing prior to confiscation and possible
destruction of his animal."
Mr Howard never surrendered his "wolf-hybrid type animals" to Animal
Control
so his dogs are still alive today.